UN asks Syria to withdraw troops

Published October 20, 2004

UNITED NATIONS, Oct 19: The UN Security Council on Tuesday urged Syria to withdraw its remaining troops from neighbouring Lebanon and asked Secretary-General Kofi Annan to continue reporting any progress.

In a statement read out by Ambassador Adam Thomson of the United Kingdom, which holds the Council's rotating presidency this month, voiced the council's concern that the requirements set out in resolution 1559 had not been met as reported by the secretary-general.

That resolution, narrowly adopted on Sept 2 just before elections in Lebanon, declared the council's support for polling free from outside influence and called for the withdrawal of all remaining foreign forces, the disbanding of all militias and the extension of government control over the entire country.

The issue was contentious because a statement requires the consent of all 15 council members. Algeria, the only Arab member of the council, had hesitated until the last minute.

If Algeria had refused, the United States and France planned to adopt a resolution that might have produced abstentions from Algeria, Pakistan and others. The Sept 2 resolution was adopted with the minimum nine votes required.

Mr Annan said in a report earlier this month that aside from a UN peacekeeping force, the only significant foreign forces deployed in Lebanon at the end of September were Syrian. He said Damascus indicated having some 14,000 troops still inside its smaller neighbour stationed near the border and that it had redeployed about 3,000 other forces.

According to that report, both Lebanon and Syria said that the timing of further withdrawals would be determined by the security situation in Lebanon and the region, but both countries said they could not provide a schedule for such action.

Tuesday's statement reaffirmed the council's strong support for the territorial integrity, sovereignty and political independence of Lebanon within its internationally recognized borders.

It also urged relevant parties to implement fully all provisions of the resolution and welcomed the secretary-general's readiness to assist the parties in this regard.

Opinion

Merging for what?

Merging for what?

The concern is that if the government is thinking of cutting costs through the merger, we might even lose the functionality levels we currently have.

Editorial

Dubai properties
Updated 16 May, 2024

Dubai properties

It is hoped that any investigation that is conducted will be fair and that no wrongdoing will be excused.
In good faith
16 May, 2024

In good faith

THE ‘P’ in PTI might as well stand for perplexing. After a constant yo-yoing around holding talks, the PTI has...
CTDs’ shortcomings
16 May, 2024

CTDs’ shortcomings

WHILE threats from terrorist groups need to be countered on the battlefield through military means, long-term ...
Reserved seats
Updated 15 May, 2024

Reserved seats

The ECP's decisions and actions clearly need to be reviewed in light of the country’s laws.
Secretive state
15 May, 2024

Secretive state

THERE is a fresh push by the state to stamp out all criticism by using the alibi of protecting national interests....
Plague of rape
15 May, 2024

Plague of rape

FLAWED narratives about women — from being weak and vulnerable to provocative and culpable — have led to...