US strikes necessary: Washington Post

Published September 15, 2008

WASHINGTON, Sept 14: US military strikes at Taliban and Al Qaeda targets inside Pakistan are risky but necessary and were long overdue, says a Washington Post editorial published on Sunday.

“They must continue.”

The newspaper claimed that for more than six years, the Bush administration relied on Pakistan to combat the militants but it only strengthened the Taliban and Al Qaeda networks in Fata.

The policy, the Post said, also led to a steady increase in Taliban assaults on US and Nato forces in Afghanistan while US intelligence community believed that Al Qaeda was using its bases to prepare for new attacks on Western targets, including the United States.

“By now it is clear that Pakistani army and security forces lack the capacity to defeat the extremists — and may even support some of the Taliban commanders,” the paper claimed. “Pakistan’s army has arranged truces with some of the extremists that don’t preclude them from fighting in Afghanistan.”

Opinion

Editorial

Border clashes
19 May, 2024

Border clashes

THE Pakistan-Afghanistan frontier has witnessed another series of flare-ups, this time in the Kurram tribal district...
Penalising the dutiful
19 May, 2024

Penalising the dutiful

DOES the government feel no remorse in burdening honest citizens with the cost of its own ineptitude? With the ...
Students in Kyrgyzstan
Updated 19 May, 2024

Students in Kyrgyzstan

The govt ought to take a direct approach comprising convincing communication with the students and Kyrgyz authorities.
Ominous demands
Updated 18 May, 2024

Ominous demands

The federal government needs to boost its revenues to reduce future borrowing and pay back its existing debt.
Property leaks
18 May, 2024

Property leaks

THE leaked Dubai property data reported on by media organisations around the world earlier this week seems to have...
Heat warnings
18 May, 2024

Heat warnings

STARTING next week, the country must brace for brutal heatwaves. The NDMA warns of severe conditions with...