SECP penalizes 12 firms

Published September 29, 2005

ISLAMABAD, Sept 28: The enforcement department of the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan has taken action against 12 companies for violating different legal requirements during August 2005.

Of the 12 companies, five were penalized for non/late filing of quarterly accounts, while two companies were penalized for not providing incremental depreciation on revalued assets, which resulted in overstatement of profit for the year ended June 30, 2004.

According to a statement issued here on Wednesday, these companies included Tandlianwala Sugar Mills Ltd, Redco Textiles Ltd, Quality Steel Works Limited, Service Fabrics Ltd, Johnson & Philips (Pakistan) Ltd, Suhail Jute Mills Ltd and Mian Textile Mills Ltd.

The statement said that Hashimi Can Company Limited failed to pay its liabilities towards Hashmi Can Provident Fund and was directed to pay outstanding liabilities of the provident fund within the prescribed time.

Muslim Ghee Mills Limited was directed to convene its overdue annual general meetings and to present therein the audited accounts before the shareholders. In another case, Service Fabrics Limited was advised to proceed with the sale of assets only after disclosure of facts to the SECP.

Besides, two companies, Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited and Ittehad Chemicals Limited, were directed to provide material information to shareholders in connection with proposed resolutions at general meetings.

During the month under review, the enforcement department resolved 214 complaints out of 254 received from the investors. Comments on the remaining 40 complaints are being sought from the companies concerned.

The complaints mainly related to non-receipt of dividend warrants, non-encashment of dividend warrants, delay/non-transfer of shares and issue of duplicate shares, non-receipt of annual and interim accounts, wrongful deduction of Zakat, non-holding of AGM, non-circulation of notice of meeting, etc.

Opinion

Merging for what?

Merging for what?

The concern is that if the government is thinking of cutting costs through the merger, we might even lose the functionality levels we currently have.

Editorial

Dubai properties
Updated 16 May, 2024

Dubai properties

It is hoped that any investigation that is conducted will be fair and that no wrongdoing will be excused.
In good faith
16 May, 2024

In good faith

THE ‘P’ in PTI might as well stand for perplexing. After a constant yo-yoing around holding talks, the PTI has...
CTDs’ shortcomings
16 May, 2024

CTDs’ shortcomings

WHILE threats from terrorist groups need to be countered on the battlefield through military means, long-term ...
Reserved seats
Updated 15 May, 2024

Reserved seats

The ECP's decisions and actions clearly need to be reviewed in light of the country’s laws.
Secretive state
15 May, 2024

Secretive state

THERE is a fresh push by the state to stamp out all criticism by using the alibi of protecting national interests....
Plague of rape
15 May, 2024

Plague of rape

FLAWED narratives about women — from being weak and vulnerable to provocative and culpable — have led to...