Salman cleared in Aishwarya tape case

Published September 17, 2005

MUMBAI, Sept 16: A tape in which Indian heart-throb Salman Khan was supposedly heard threatening Bollywood star Aishwarya Rai with underworld retribution unless she performed a show did not contain his voice, police said on Friday.

Mumbai police said the voice on the tape was not Khan’s after carrying out laboratory investigations.

“The forensic laboratory that conducted the tests has given us a report saying the voice on the tape does not match with that of Salman Khan,” Mumbai additional police commissioner K.L. Bishnoi told reporters.

In the audio tape broadcast by television networks earlier this year, a man alleged to be Khan was heard threatening Rai, a former Miss World.

The man said she would face underworld retribution if she did not take part in stage shows sponsored by mafia don Abu Salem.

Friday’s police announcement followed an investigation ordered last July by R.R. Patil, deputy chief minister of western Maharashtra state, into the contents of the tape.

The tape was supposedly based on a phone conversation between Khan and Rai said to have been recorded by police in 2001.

After the tape was aired, both Khan and Rai declared it a fake.

Khan, known for his tough guy roles in Hindi movies who has a huge fan following, is Rai’s former boyfriend.

But his denials failed to calm Hindu right-wing protestors who demanded his arrest for a comment on the tape that he knew about a series of bomb blasts suspected to have been organised by the underworld in Mumbai in 1992.

Khan could not be reached for comment Friday.

But his father, Salim Khan, expressed joy over the police declaration that the tape did not contain his son’s voice.

“Salman and our family were pitted against some clever, dangerous people who meticulously planned to defame him and stooped to such low levels,” Khan, a veteran screenplay writer, told AFP.

Voice samples of Khan and Rai along with the recording of the phone conversation had been examined at a forensic laboratory in the northern city of Chandigarh to see whether they matched.—AFP

Opinion

Merging for what?

Merging for what?

The concern is that if the government is thinking of cutting costs through the merger, we might even lose the functionality levels we currently have.

Editorial

Dubai properties
Updated 16 May, 2024

Dubai properties

It is hoped that any investigation that is conducted will be fair and that no wrongdoing will be excused.
In good faith
16 May, 2024

In good faith

THE ‘P’ in PTI might as well stand for perplexing. After a constant yo-yoing around holding talks, the PTI has...
CTDs’ shortcomings
16 May, 2024

CTDs’ shortcomings

WHILE threats from terrorist groups need to be countered on the battlefield through military means, long-term ...
Reserved seats
Updated 15 May, 2024

Reserved seats

The ECP's decisions and actions clearly need to be reviewed in light of the country’s laws.
Secretive state
15 May, 2024

Secretive state

THERE is a fresh push by the state to stamp out all criticism by using the alibi of protecting national interests....
Plague of rape
15 May, 2024

Plague of rape

FLAWED narratives about women — from being weak and vulnerable to provocative and culpable — have led to...