Serbia: criminals take to polls

Published December 20, 2003

BELGRADE: Ultra-nationalists led by a war crimes suspect from behind bars may become the biggest group in Serbia’s parliament. Three small parties are fielding candidates who have been indicted by the UN tribunal in The Hague.

This is democracy at work in Serbia ahead of a Dec 28 general election, expected to show strong support for the nationalist right three years after pro-Western reformers toppled Slobodan Milosevic as Yugoslav president.

“It is obviously very disturbing,” UN human rights official Laurie Wiseberg said about the four Hague indictees running in the parliamentary election, including Milosevic for his once-mighty Socialist Party.

European Union foreign policy chief Javier Solana, urging Serbs not to choose the past, told reporters in Belgrade that having accused war criminals as election candidates could be seen as a “provocation” by people outside the country.

Wiseberg, who heads the mission of the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, expressed concern that local people and media appeared to accept it as something normal.

“Nobody seems to be terribly upset about it,” she said.

Rights activists argue that Serbs must face the truth about killings and other atrocities committed in their name during Milosevic’s rule in order to move forward and foster reconciliation with neighbours in Bosnia, Kosovo and Croatia.

Many people here see the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) as biased against them, rejecting the view widely held in the West that Serb forces were often the main culprits in the wars that tore apart socialist Yugoslavia.

“I think there has never really been an acceptance of the fact that those who engaged in war crimes should be punished,” Wiseberg said.

WESTERN PRESSURE: Under heavy Western pressure to cooperate with the UN tribunal, the outgoing pro-reform coalition handed over Milosevic and many other suspects after it took power in 2000.

But it acted mainly because the impoverished country would otherwise risk a freeze in crucial US aid.

“The government has portrayed cooperation with The Hague as a means of receiving economic assistance from abroad rather than a duty to victims and justice,” said Bogdan Ivanisevic of US-based Human Rights Watch.—Reuters

Opinion

Political capitalism

Political capitalism

Pakistani decision-makers salivate at the prospect of a one-party state but without paying attention to those additional ingredients.

Editorial

Spending restrictions
Updated 13 May, 2024

Spending restrictions

The country's "recovery" in recent months remains fragile and any shock at this point can mean a relapse.
Climate authority
13 May, 2024

Climate authority

WITH the authorities dragging their feet for seven years on the establishment of a Climate Change Authority and...
Vending organs
13 May, 2024

Vending organs

IN these cash-strapped times, black marketers in the organ trade are returning to rake it in by harvesting the ...
A turbulent 2023
Updated 12 May, 2024

A turbulent 2023

Govt must ensure judiciary's independence, respect for democratic processes, and protection for all citizens against abuse of power.
A moral victory
12 May, 2024

A moral victory

AS the UN General Assembly overwhelmingly voted on Friday in favour of granting Palestine greater rights at the...
Hope after defeat
12 May, 2024

Hope after defeat

ON Saturday, having fallen behind Japan in the first quarter of the Sultan Azlan Shah Cup final, Pakistan showed...