PML-N’s parliamentary party nominates Shahbaz for Punjab CM

Published June 3, 2013
Shahbaz Sharif.—File Photo by APP
Shahbaz Sharif.—File Photo by APP

LAHORE: The parliamentary party of Pakistan Muslim League – Nawaz (PML-N) on Monday formally nominated Shahbaz Sharif for the post of chief minister Punjab, DawnNews reported.

Moreover, Rana Mohammad Iqbal and Sher Ali Gorchani were nominated for the positions of Punjab Assembly’s speaker and deputy speaker respectively.

The nominations were unanimously approved by all members present at the meeting of the parliamentary party held in Lahore’s Alhamra Hall and presided by Nawaz Sharif.

Addressing the meeting, Shahbaz Sharif urged the newly-elected members to live up to the expectations of the people who had reposed their faith in them and work for the elimination of ‘patwari’ culture.

Shahbaz said in the past five years his party was accused for playing the role of ‘friendly opposition’ to the then-PPP-led government, adding that the PML-N was also held responsible for the power crisis.

He vowed that his party would end corruption in the country and would work to make Punjab one of the world’s best provinces.

Opinion

Editorial

Impending slaughter
Updated 07 May, 2024

Impending slaughter

Seven months into the slaughter, there are no signs of hope.
Wheat investigation
07 May, 2024

Wheat investigation

THE Shehbaz Sharif government is in a sort of Catch-22 situation regarding the alleged wheat import scandal. It is...
Naila’s feat
07 May, 2024

Naila’s feat

IN an inspirational message from the base camp of Nepal’s Mount Makalu, Pakistani mountaineer Naila Kiani stressed...
Plugging the gap
06 May, 2024

Plugging the gap

IN Pakistan, bias begins at birth for the girl child as discriminatory norms, orthodox attitudes and poverty impede...
Terrains of dread
Updated 06 May, 2024

Terrains of dread

Restored faith in the police is unachievable without political commitment and interprovincial support.
Appointment rules
Updated 06 May, 2024

Appointment rules

If the judiciary had the power to self-regulate, it ought to have exercised it instead of involving the legislature.