THE report of the court of enquiry on the disturbances against Ahmadis in 1953 in parts of Punjab ended on the following poignant note:

“It is our deep conviction that if the Ahrar had been treated as a pure question of law and order without political considerations, one district magistrate and one superintendent of police could have dealt with them.

“Consequently, we are prompted by something that they call human conscience to enquire whether in our present state of political development, the administrative problem of law and order cannot be divorced from a democratic bedfellow called ministerial government which is so remorselessly haunted by political nightmares.

“But if democracy means the subordination of law and order to political ends – then Allah knoweth best and we end the report.”

Read Lashkare Jhangvi for Ahrar and take Hazara Shias as the victims instead of Ahmadis, that conclusion holds good even today – sixty yeas later.

After all the report was authored by M. Munir and M.R. Kayani – the former known for his inquisitive mind and the latter for his independence – after an enquiry lasting a year in which, besides facts, doctrinal differences were examined in painstaking detail.

As the disturbances spread and the central cabinet felt-persuaded to treat the Ahrar agitation as a law and order problem, the Punjab chief minister still dithered fearing a conflagration.

The Lahore garrison commander was asked by the governor general as to how long it would take his troops to restore order on the streets of Lahore.

Gen Azam thought no more than twenty-four hours. He stood by his word.

If the leaders of today were also to treat the militant campaign against Hazara Shias as a law and order problem, the Quetta garrison commander might take twenty-four days but no more.

Still a big question mark hangs all along the line but there is no other way out – not even the solution that Zulfikar Ali Bhutto and his legislators devised in dealing with the renewed agitation against Ahmadis twenty years later.

Both the times and parties concerned have changed.

KUNWAR IDRIS Karachi


Comments are closed.

Comments (8)

S.A.Hyder.Ph.D.
February 21, 2013 11:05 pm
Mr. Baba: Who has told you that your values are right. Pakistan was NOT created for Islam. Pakistan was created for Muslims AND every one else who wanted to live there. IT WAS NOT CREATED FOR SHARIA LAWS. It is people like you who have been brainwashed, by you know who, who think and want sharia laws. People who do not have the slightest idea what the --- sharia law is. For your information Jinnah was Shia. If shias 'are not living according to Islamic values' then Jinnah could not have created Pakistan to be governed by YOUR Sharia Laws!!! I would suggest to you Mr. Ghazi to be tolerant of others points of views before you get elevated to one level above ghazi!!! Remember in Pakistan every thing is possible. According to you if these Shias are not living as per Islamic values then should they be killed? If all who are not living according to "your" Islamic values should be killed, then only a handful of those barbarians emanating from Saudi Arabia would have a right to live on this earth.
Ghazi baba
February 21, 2013 6:09 am
Pakistan was created for Islam and Shariah should be the governing principle for all its people. These Shias are not living according to Islamic values.
Insaan
February 21, 2013 2:10 am
Over time we've become increasingly intolerant about almost anything and everything. All this intolerance in the name of religion, our priorities are totally upside down. If religion is kept out of the equation for a moment, are we behaving how a 'human being' is supposed to behave? A human being, first of all, is honest and truthful to him/herself..... Lets be honest to ourselves and start tolerating differences/diversities. Love what Mr. A S Edhi has said "No religion is above humanity".
Masood Mukhtar
February 20, 2013 9:26 pm
"Ban politics on the name of religion" is the solution of all these problems. Don't do it face the consequences,otherwise thats only a beginning the real disastor is on her way; just wait for Americans to leave Afghanistan and let these animals free.
Moin Ramiz
February 20, 2013 7:58 pm
what is going on in Pakistan right now is also connected with Afghanistan situation.
S.A.Hyder.Ph.D.
February 20, 2013 4:03 pm
"Both the times and parties concerned have changed". However the situation remains frightfully unchanged!!!
Shakeel Ahmed
February 20, 2013 8:42 am
Remember those were the days of Pakistan in its infancy. Since then and the advent of the 1974 constitutional amendments, a new generation of army, politicians and general public has born and been brought up on a parochial mindset with hatred and intolerance on religious grounds being part of the curriculum. How can you then expect better things and tolerance of other religions (be it whatever) to be respected? Things are simply going from bad to worse. Time is not far away when declaring more sects as non-Muslim will be on the agenda soon. So sad.
mazharuddin
February 20, 2013 5:53 am
Unfortunately our society is hypocrite, people using religion for their vested interests. There are several factions having their base on SAYINGS OF PROPHET while Sayings collected near about after 125 AH, further there are contrary and suspicious sayings not meeting to Quranic laws. On one saying about MEHDI there are four factions having IMAM and HAAZIR IMAM. There need to have research work on sayings, unfortunately some factions do not agree due to their own interests. According to Sunni Hanafi doctrine there is no room to believe in it, so the Sunni's have no concern. Their belief is to worship to God, be honest in own personal duties with high character and this is the main theme of religion. Religion is not to worship prophet, saints and other pious personalities and their praises but only to God. In this era of civilization need to have research work for unification as all glory to Islam and Muslims was till about 125 AH through the early Muslims who were honest and not having hypocrisy. See the character of Muhammad Ben Qasim and Hujjaj. No beggar priests spread the borders of Islam. Even Arabic inscription in subcontinent is left by early Muslim rulers but not left their splendid palaces and love stories. This is not Islamic practices to be enjoy with grants and no work for own survival. Media should relay such material that having truth but not mystic and fallacy.