THE Pakistan government had resolved in principle to give India MFN status by end of 2012. Regrettably, it has sought an extension in the implementation of this decision, an outcome that could have been avoided through better preparation on the management of this transition.

The Institute of Public Policy, Beaconhouse National University, has undertaken a major study (of which this writer was one of the authors) on the potential of, and gains from, further trade liberalisation with India. This article attempts to summarise the findings.

Both countries have made major concessions recently. Pakistan has eliminated its ‘positive list’ and opted for a shorter ‘negative list’ of 1,209 tariff lines, resulting in a sharp increase in tariff lines importable from India. This list will be replaced by a briefer ‘sensitive list’ following the granting of full MFN status to India. The latter has reduced the list of items that Pakistan cannot export to India by 30 per cent and declared its intention to reduce the sensitive list to 100 items and lower the duty rate to five per cent by April 2013.

However, our analysis shows that although India has ostensibly opened up its trade regime for products from Pakistan through a reduction in the number of items on its sensitive list, the concession is less liberal than it appears. When the items on the sensitive list are quantified on the basis of the eight-digit level of HS Code, the number of tariff lines in India’s list at 1,753 is significantly more than the number of tariff lines, 1577, in Pakistan’s sensitive list for India.

Furthermore, Pakistan has given preferential treatment to far more tariff lines for imports from India; India’s sensitive list only grants preferential treatment to 65 per cent of Pakistan’s exports, and is heavily loaded with agricultural and textile products in which Pakistan has a comparative advantage. Pakistani exporters also have to negotiate more than a dozen legislations, a plethora of standard setting and certifying agencies implementing multiple laws and regulations that make trade in agriculture more restrictive. Indian has high import duties, ranging from 30 per cent for most produce to 70 per cent on rice and 100 per cent on wheat.

This protection comes despite massive subsidies on agricultural inputs borne by the Indian and state governments of close to $50 billion per annum, amounting to 15.3 per cent of production and 5.2 per cent of GNP, compared with Pakistan’s agriculture-related subsidies of less than one per cent of GDP and tariffs ranging from five to 10 per cent with zero duty in the case of cotton.

On many of the value-added items of textiles in India’s sensitive list the duty is the higher of the rate of 10 per cent or a specific duty. For several products the ad valorem equivalent of the specific duties exceeds 100 per cent. The maximum duty, excluding automobiles, in Pakistan is 30 per cent,

The composition of India’s sensitive list is particularly important for Pakistan because India has reduced more sharply its sensitive list for Bangladesh and signed an FTA with Sri Lanka. For example, India’s sensitive list comprises only 25 items in the case of Bangladesh. This has helped Bangladesh increase its garment exports to India by 46 per cent in 2011/12, inducing fears that the exceptional access to India’s markets, while denying Pakistan a ‘level playing field’, could incentivise flow of investment capital outside Pakistan to Bangladesh and Sri Lanka to take advantage of the more liberalised trade environment for these two countries.

This is particularly important because India, with its more diversified industrial structure and export base, is likely to gradually move out of textiles, opening up opportunities for countries like Pakistan and Bangladesh in the large Indian market.

The study projects that India’s exports to Pakistan in the next three years will grow from $1.4bn to $6.3bn with a significant proportion of this increase representing the shift to formal trade of items that were being ‘informally traded’. Pakistan’s exports to India in the medium-term are projected to increase $300 million to $1.3bn

Trade liberalisation with the granting of MFN status to India, the implementation of tariff reductions under Safta and the induction of structural reforms in Pakistan is projected to push up the country’s GDP in the medium-term by a ‘moderately favourable’ 1.5 per cent to a healthy four per cent.

In the case of the more cautious assumptions for the ‘modestly favourable’ outcome: Pakistan’s private investment will rise from 1.25 per cent of GDP to 4.2; there will be a net increase in employment of approximately 170,000; prices will decline by around one percentage point; the current account will become a surplus of more than $1bn; fiscal deficit will increase by Rs130bn, even though tax revenues are expected to grow by Rs70bn; the average gain for consumers is estimated at Rs2,300 per household.


Comments are closed.

Comments (32)

sourabh
February 20, 2013 1:16 pm
ehh never mind!
Ahmed Sultan (India)
February 20, 2013 10:15 am
I thought we are already there most favorite nation. As they see us in their dreams also
raja hindustani
February 20, 2013 6:56 am
Pak is going to be benefited more in case it gives MFN status to India. So for India we hardly care if pak give us MFN status or not.
BRR
February 20, 2013 1:58 am
Quite often clothes made in Pakistan, Bangladesh, India, etc. are all sold next to each other in dept. stores. How would one choose if they are all of relative quality? One ends up selecting based on biases, and likes and dislikes. No goodwill equals no sale.
bharat
February 19, 2013 10:09 pm
As an Indian - I absolutely agree - We don't want you to give us anything , and we do not want to give you anything. In fact make that sedscond part a strong sentence Good luck with your economics
Mushtaq Ahmed
February 19, 2013 7:38 pm
MFN to India is intertwined with resolving political disputes. Unless semblance of peace prevails which can happen only if India resolves Siachin, Sir Creek & water flow to begin with & Kashmir. Trade with India should flow naturally so that people of both countries can benefit.
ks
February 19, 2013 7:24 pm
Vijay, for that we have Hindi press
Raj
February 19, 2013 5:49 pm
India China trade is in favour of china even though India do trade with China. Even America has trade deficit with China though they do trade with China. You got cheaper product from china for lower middle class and for poor while rich people get costly product with little better quality. So ultimately consumer benefits. Muslim people lived with Hindu banias 1000 years still they are so occupied with Hindu hatred that they didn't learn tricks of the trade from Hindu Bania.
koushik
February 19, 2013 3:44 pm
why do you care??
koushik
February 19, 2013 3:43 pm
just like china and US...so much love between them..nah
koushik
February 19, 2013 3:41 pm
stay put in africa
AS Aklam
February 19, 2013 2:00 pm
No one is forcing Pakis to give MFN status to India. If Paki wishes, they do not have to trade with India at all. So, stop blaming India for al your woes, figure out what you need to do and do it. But there in lies the problem. Pakis haven't figured out what, how, and why for last 60 years! A country born in coufusion and lives in confusion.
Vijay K
February 19, 2013 1:56 pm
Feroz, for that we have the urdu press.
Vijay K
February 19, 2013 1:52 pm
I'm from USA, and I don't care if products are Indian or Pakistani. My hard earned dollars go for quality goods, irrespective of country of origin.
Zak
February 19, 2013 1:50 pm
MFN to INdia, no, no, no. Don't give privileges to the one who funds terrorist activities in Pakistan and occupies kashmir.
NASAH (USA)
February 19, 2013 1:21 pm
That will NEVER happen. Pakistan vested interests too many too insecure.
Chanakya
February 19, 2013 12:46 pm
Be Indian Buy Indian... I am an Indian in Australia and we Indians don't buy any Paki items although they sell it in Indian stores like rice, pickles etc. But if all Indians will buy everything Indian ... India will be develop soon according to Govt. of India.
Rafiq Minhas
February 19, 2013 12:42 pm
I'm puzzled by all the pros and cons in the article. But if it's so convoluted to trade with India, how come China (60 billion dollars trade) and over a hundred other countries do that? Are those countries smarter than us or are we creating imaginary problems and splitting hair?
raika45
February 19, 2013 12:06 pm
There are sectors in your agreement that seem to be left out.Does Pakistan have an indigenous truck and bus assembly? I mean building everything from scratch with parts sourced locally? Why not team up with an Indian company like Tatas and such to have a common approach. It will save your country millions in getting parts or trucks from overseas.Learn from them and then do it on your own.Tata did it by teaming up with mercedes benz years ago. look where it is now.
Iqbal
February 19, 2013 11:34 am
whoever thinks that it will benefit Pakistan lives in his own paradise.
samsuddin
February 19, 2013 10:40 am
It is basically an issue for Pakistan to take a decision. Since this is an election year nobody from civilian - political parties wants to take a decision on this issue and as far as the establishment is concerned they will never be enthusiastic about it. So the show goes on ...and on ..and on ....
prakash.
February 19, 2013 9:39 am
on one side, hand over gwadar port to china, on second side give mfn to india. Lage raho.
Joe India
February 19, 2013 8:33 am
Very Good Article ........ Trade will boost Pakistan economy, Will create more job's , reduce extremism, & India will get more economic integration in south Asia, help more access to central Asia via Pakistan, & definitely will get a friend in neighbor. Let us sing the song of love & Co-operation together . ( I am an Indian in Africa. I am using VIP rice & Shan curry powder from Pakistan . Let it available in Mumbai & Delhi too & Indian Items in Islamabad :) )
rich
February 19, 2013 8:27 am
great article, but as u say initially pakistn maybe in a deficit, hence govt in pakistn will not give india mnf status now as election are near, any decision on mnf will be after the election in the west now politics pure economic, but in the continent it still politics of apeasement and short term popular schemes i hope trde bet the 2 countries increase to a levei wher it becomes difficult for the howks of the countries to talk of war bet them Richie
hello
February 19, 2013 7:51 am
good for pakistan.india do have a robust economy and variety of trading partners so india don't care much anyway.
a.k.lal
February 19, 2013 7:47 am
india and Pak should not trade with each other, but develop separately
Soulmind, UAE
February 19, 2013 7:37 am
Pakistan is coming to its term...it has wasted a window of opportunity in the hand of Jehadist useless manifesto of conquering the south Asia... now the country should not play into the hand of this elements otherwise it will be difficult for Pakistan to save itself from the tentacles of violence.
viti99
February 19, 2013 7:27 am
I have often read many pakistanis complaining about India's not so rosy treatment to Pakistani industries. But seldom they have becked it up with with hard data. However, this article of yours does highlight the dilemma that Pakistan faces vis-a-vis India in trade, and justifies it with real statistics. A very good article indeed.
sourabh
February 19, 2013 5:45 am
i would like to know perception of pakistani citizens on this issue!
Feroz sethi
February 19, 2013 5:23 am
I am an ordinary Pakistani and don't understand such complicated trade lingo or it's analysis. Why don't you write about simpler topics that make me feel good or make me angry? Like Pakistan having more nuclear weapons or how India is stealing our water or even better write about how 1 Muslim is better than 10 Hindus. Why write such boring articles that the masses cannot undertand,eh?
Shiv
February 19, 2013 4:35 am
The MFN status is made to appear like a country specific arrangement, where as it is part of a global arrangement. The basic charter is that any country deals with another on an equitable basis and does not have a discriminatory policy towards any specifc country. Pakistan would have a point to make if India has any Pakistan specific policies on trade.
Zalim Singh
February 19, 2013 3:09 am
will be to Pakistan's benefit.