Was it the establishment who used Tahirul Qadri but failed, or was it Qadri who used the establishment and succeeded?

_____________________

Pakistan Spring?

During a talk that I was invited to deliver early last year at the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) in London, and then at the Shaheed Zulfikar Ali Bhutto Institute of Science & Technology (SZABIST) in Karachi in November 2012, the question that kept coming my way the most from Pakistani students was that whether Pakistan can or will ever experience something akin to the Arab Spring?

The truth is Pakistan is perhaps one of few Muslim countries that has experienced these kinds of Springs on numerous occasions.

Most of the times these have led to the ouster of military dictators and, ironically, on one occasion a protest movement actually ended up preparing the ground and an opening for a military coup and subsequent dictatorship.

It is important to keep all this in mind before one attempts to launch into understanding phenomenons where men like cricketer-turned-politician, Imran Khan, and more recently, Dr. Tahirul Qadri, were both seen (and imagined) as being the forces who would lead a Pakistan Spring of sorts.

I am always surprised to notice the negligible amounts of knowledge most young Pakistanis have about the previous generations’ notable role in making Pakistan perhaps the only Muslim country (apart from maybe Turkey), where a number of democratic movements constantly challenged military dictatorships, making sure that unlike a majority of Arab countries, Pakistan never had a one-party dictatorship that ruled for decades.

In the late 1960s, a movement led by leftist students forced Pakistan’s first military dictator to resign, paving the way for multiparty democracy.

A student is grabbed by security personnel for trying to assassinate the first Pakistani military dictator, Ayub Khan in Peshawar in 1968.

A student is grabbed by security personnel for trying to assassinate the first Pakistani military dictator, Ayub Khan in Peshawar in 1968.

In 1977 a right-wing movement rose against an elected but authoritarian ‘socialist’ regime that, however, ended up ushering in a reactionary military dictatorship.

This dictatorship then faced at least three major democratic movements in the 1980s, making way for democracy’s return in 1988.

Then between 2006 and 2007, a widespread movement forced another military dictator to hold multiparty election and eventually resign in 2008.

All those Springs that took place in the Arab world were against one-party rules and dictatorships that had been dominating the politics of the impacted countries for decades.

In Pakistan, young followers of men like Imran Khan and Dr. Tahirul Qadri have often talked about emulating the uprisings in Arab countries. But ever since 2008 Pakistan has been under an elected ruling coalition of centre-left parties and an active parliament.

Imran Khan, the charismatic former captain of the Pakistan cricket team and (ever since 1996), the head of his centre-right party, the Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaaf (Pakistan Justice Party), has been threatening to wipe out Pakistan’s ‘corrupt politics and system’ with the help of a ‘revolutionary tsunami.’

Though ever since 2010 he has been able to get a pretty decent number of urban middle-class youth on his side, he has struggled to blunt accusations that claim him to be an ‘artificial construct of the military-establishment’ and being soft on Islamist extremists that have been haunting Pakistan for years now.

Khan has categorically refuted these allegations, but he has certainly reoriented his revolutionary rhetoric and now overtly states himself to be a democrat who believes that real change in Pakistan can only come through the ballot.

Imran Khan is still an enigma for many Pakistanis. Accused by his detractors of being soft on Islamic extremists, Khan has always vehemently denied the allegations.

Imran Khan is still an enigma for many Pakistanis. Accused by his detractors of being soft on Islamic extremists, Khan has always vehemently denied the allegations.

But just when everyone was waiting for the current coalition government led by the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) to complete its 5-year-term in March this year and announce fresh election, Dr. Tahirul Qadri appeared on the scene, waving his fist to lead a ‘long march’ to occupy Pakistan’s manicured capital, Islamabad, and turn that city into a Tahrir Square (the place where the Arab Spring was launched in Egypt).

His sudden appearance and move took everyone by surprise. Most of his critics in the government, the opposition and the media were quick to denounce him as being yet another ploy and puppet of those sections of the country’s military-establishment and intelligence agencies who have been blamed time and time again for derailing democracy in Pakistan.


Comments are closed.

Comments (152)

qadri
January 26, 2013 11:53 am
A good article presenting detailed analysis and history developments
Wondering
January 26, 2013 11:25 am
How come this confused man is a senior columnist. He just have headline knowledge mostly collected over the internet. Looks like he is also an stooge writing what the masters ask.
Noor Ahmad Khan
January 26, 2013 11:21 am
NFP Could you please translate the original caption under the photograph of Ahmed Raza Khan. I might have misread it but I thought it said He was convinced of of the illegitimacy of photographing. So much for moderate and enlightened vision. Feels like all were the same.
Noor Ahmad Khan
January 26, 2013 11:14 am
Let me be the devil's advocate and suggest something. TUQ didn't want the "long march" turn violent because of the possible repercussions: not in Pakistan but in Canada. We are thankful to him for that. Just a request: Please step down from the divine throne so that we are not condemned for criticizing you. TUQ himself may not condone such things against his critics but his followers love him and adore him blindly.
winston
January 26, 2013 9:07 am
Jesus did not bring any laws: only Jews and muslims were given law by God
anonymous
January 26, 2013 6:31 am
Large croud you say , if you have seen it then you would not say it because there were no more then few thousands and it did not prove anything except for the chance of Qadri in next elections along with the leaders that are still in power .
Farooq
January 26, 2013 4:50 am
Its totally wrong to say that Barelvis like Qawwali. Imam Ahmad Raza Khan RA, written a complete book on 'Ahkaam uSamaa', in which he laid down the rules of Samaa: 1: Kalam recited is only Hamd or Naat 2: Listeners are all pious people, not in a worldly gathering 3: No woman or young boys allowed to sing the Ashaar of Samaa 4: No music or clapping is allowed As far I know Barelvi maslak is very strict on these things at least what is mentioned by Imam Ahmad Raza Khan
Farooq
January 26, 2013 4:24 am
I don't think the author really knows what 'Barelvi' Maslak really is, at least from what he has described here. Also one needs to know that what is termed as 'Barelvi' Islam is what the traditional Islam was until two centuries ago when a movement from Saudi Arabia tried to distort the real face of Islam which was practised for centuries in not only sub-continent but throughout the world. Author also failed to mention that traditional Barelvi scholars do not recognise Dr. Qadri as one of their own rather they distance themselves.
SM
January 26, 2013 3:22 am
Yes, India is very peaceful especially with Muslims. Give me a break.
Anis Farhat Jamal
January 25, 2013 9:17 pm
Totally agree with these comments. Let us not get carried away by two hypocrites.......and the contradictions in their words and deeds.
Nasir
January 25, 2013 9:01 pm
O Now you come to your point, so military has the solution for all problems in Pakistan in your mind. hmmm
Ajmal Khur
January 25, 2013 9:00 pm
"...both founders of Secular Republics following the sunnah of our Prophet AS who founded the Secular Republic of Medin..." ================ You are extremely ill-informed! Secularism means absence of the Sacred, that is, Divine. A Prophet or a Messenger of God can never bring secularistic ideas, as he is immersed in the Oneness of the Divine Being. The Constitution of Medina was pluralistic, not secular.
Nasir
January 25, 2013 8:58 pm
The only difference is one was a leader while other was planted by imperialist.
Ajmal Khur
January 25, 2013 8:56 pm
Very confused.
Ajmal Khur
January 25, 2013 8:53 pm
You're still splitting hair. 'Adl and Insaaf are used interchangeably. It's what is intended by the speaker that matters, not your technical splitting hair.
Ajmal Khur
January 25, 2013 8:49 pm
What does 'becoz' mean? Dr. tahir ul Qadri has provided enough explanation, but for those who are open minded and patiently take the time to digest what he says.
Erfan
January 25, 2013 8:38 pm
I cannot understand how people are coming to the conclusion that Dr. Qadri achieved anything in this drama; none of his demands were met and we should be grateful for that. Why should the assemblies be dissolved when a democratic system is finally reaching it's culminating point of peaceful transfer of power through the ballot. That should be our utmost desire and that is the only process that will make Pakistan a stronger nation over time. His demand that the military and the SC should be consulted in the caretaker set up is undemocratic as well and would again hurt us. It benefits only the undemocratic forces, again. As for him not taking part in politics; big deal; he failed whenever he tried. One can amass 10,000 or 100,000 people from twenty constituencies but getting that many people to vote for you in a single constituency is a different story. We, Pakistanis, should stop believing in quick fixes, for God's sake. What a day may bring a day may take. We must invest our energies in a process that holds the key to eventually deliver us the fruits and their is no better system known to mankind than democracy. We should also avoid dragging religion into politics. Religion should guide us to be a better person; honest and responsible, non-judgmental, impartial and empathetic to all rather than something we wear on our sleeve. Corruption is a big problem in Pakistan, but it is not confined to Pakistan alone. There is hardly a country on the face of earth where corruption is not rife; in some, like ours, it's open and vulgar, while in some, like the US, it's institutionalized. But, if we want to tackle it, we must build institutions, not expect personalities to deliver us. Having said that, our biggest problem at the moment is not corruption, but militancy in the name of religion and if we do not unite against it, it will surely devour us. It has destroyed the very fiber of our nation and now Pakistanis are at each other's throats and it appears that the forces to be are diverting our attention to the political setup rather than the core problem. We are hanging by our fingernails and may not have very long to mend our ways. Rudyard Kipling has aptly said, "Nations have passed away and left no traces, And history gives the naked cause of it - One single simple reason in all cases; They fell because their peoples were not fit."
lion
January 25, 2013 7:12 pm
The word "democracy" is not known to any major party as they do not practice it within. PPP family control, ANP family control. so on so on..............We all need to change within to change without. Most of the well known hold dual nationalities which makes them Hippocrates as they have sworn an oath before receiving nationality from the west.
Truth Speaker
January 25, 2013 6:53 pm
venerable sir---Islam did not spread as peacefully as you have put. Immense bloodshed of the Infidel happened. Immense. The Sikh Khalsa was only baptised cuz of that. A peaceful religion become militant to save themselves. What about the Hindu people ? Someday read the laws of Dhimmitude--not from foolish books published by islamic apologists--but those who faced the brunt of religion of peace. How the ancient university of Nalandha was razed down, and monks in the thousand cut down. What did Ghazni, Ghori, Khilji, Abdali, Nadir Shah, aurengzeb do.. Surely they were not promoting trade. They were cutting down, infidel in the thousands and other would run and embrace Islam. And since you cant leave Islam---they were permanently imprisoned.
Shameema
January 25, 2013 6:43 pm
A balanced Article...much better than your other satirical pieces on Dr.Qadri. He deserves to be taken seriously in Pakistan. He is now a serious candidate for the Presidency. I think all Pakistanis can identify with him. He is just the kind of non- partisan Monitor that we need.
abbastoronto
January 25, 2013 3:43 pm
LOL Please define Insaaf for this dim one like me whose mother tongue is U.P. Urdu.
abbastoronto
January 25, 2013 3:26 pm
Shafiq Sahib: AOA Your diatribe against education in Pakistan is uncalled for. And it certainly does not apply to me. I did not go to a Mission school, and was spared the Catholic catechism. While I am no scholar of Arabic I did take Arabic in my middle school as elective, and a diploma in it from McGIll University. Then I lived in Libya, Saudi Arabia, and the Emirates, and can sustain a conversation in Arabic if pushed into a corner. These days I live in Dearborn MI, the centre of Arab America with Arabic all around me. I am not used to reading the Quran in Urdu or English. Do you deny that Insaf comes from nisf, and that means half, and that the word nowhere exists in the Quran? Rather than force me to defend my person I suggest that you follow the trajectory of the notion of justice as it morphed from "adl" into "Insaf". It will be a revealing journey. You will learn about Islam more than you wanted to. Wassalam
Tariq
January 25, 2013 3:20 pm
What a shame indeed it's a toss up between PPP or PML-N for the Pakistani nation for another term, both of these parties have a shining record of having brought country in the 21st century !!!!
abbastoronto
January 25, 2013 3:17 pm
Fatcheck: Greetings The Sharia of Moses is based on Insaf (Equity) and Tribe. The Sharia of Jesus is based on Love and the Family. The Sharia of Mohammed AS is based on Adl (Justice) and the Individual. The three Sharias are for the three stages of economy - pastoral, agrarian, and trade. Each following sharia upholds the past one, while updating it to modern times. Insaf and Love are no longer optimal for the Exchange Economy where justice, giving each his due, is most efficient. Best wishes
aviratam
January 25, 2013 3:14 pm
a la Mao?
Rafi
January 25, 2013 3:02 pm
Dear brother , my point is very clear. Imran khan is running a political party and TUQ a religious organisation. The comparison u made is therefore unjustified. I prefer the term " Adl o Insaaf" rather than " Adl ya Insaaf". The devil my dear friend lies in our hearts.
Nasir Kazmi
January 25, 2013 2:58 pm
We Must Get Rid Of Layers Like Him. He can say any thing for his personal gains. need to have right and educated person on the top post.
ahmed
January 25, 2013 2:57 pm
I think Mr. Paracha you missed the point entirely re. Qadri 's march achievements. 1, Qadri demonstrated without any doubt that majority of Pakistanis are dissatisfied with the status quo and want a peaceful change as demonstrated by the discipline of all the participants in extreme cold weather. 2, He had made his point so he felt he didn't want to be cause for any accidents or harm to his country and his people by keeping this many people gathered in one place because of terrorist threat and mischievous elements in and out of the government. 3. He decided to get off the sean when he saw the India was becoming belligerent again and he didn't want to become a tool of the establishment by prolonging the march or divert nation 's attention to Indian actions. I salute him (and he is not going to disappear) and PPP government for doing the only decent deed it has done in five years by being tolerant and thick skinned. I wish Indian and Pakistani learn from this, media governments and people....
Rafi
January 25, 2013 2:30 pm
@ Nasir, Brother why should u feel offended? I called TUQ a visionary, secular ,international statesman.Visionary becoz he has these divine visions in his dreams, secular becoz he drafted the blasphemy laws which are fair to all religions, international for impressing the west and the Indians and finally a statesman for the way he planned his exit from the container. Frankly after his marathon speeches from the container I won't waste brain cells on his other lectures. I think the Norwegian minister who called his bluff in the Peace Conference did the job for us in exposing his double talk on blasphemy laws. To take part in elections he has to give up his Canadian nationality and that he won't do. And please, when did he become a constitutional expert , that's news to me.
abbastoronto
January 25, 2013 2:20 pm
Sajjad Sahib: AOA Both Iqbal and Jinnah were against Democracy, but for the Republic, as Democracy is winner take all, while Republic is proportional representation. Iqbal is on record in stating that Republic was the form of government closest to Islam. “Democracy” is a most misunderstood notion. It is the rule of the Demos, the 5% moneyed males, for stratified societies like India, UK, Canada, while Republic is the rule of the Public, an egalitarian government of the people, by the people, for the people (said Lincoln the Republican) led by the learned, It is favoured by France, US, PRC, and Muslim countries. To make confusing water even more muddied in popular eyes, the US Republicans and Democrats switched roles during 1920-1930. Today, the US Republicans push for Democracy abroad (since Pakistani Demos is easier to control than then Pakistani Public at large) while the Democrats want an egalitarian society (as pushed by Socrates of the Republic). Elections or adult franchise has nothing to do with either Democracy or Republic. Good governance is when public opinion is reflected at the top, whether by inheritance, appointment, selection, acclamation, request, election, or one-man one-vote franchise. It happens often even under the military where suffrage may fail as so eloquently described herein by NFP. In every overthrow of the elected government in Pakistan the public was relieved and supported the military. Pak Military is Republic minded. Wassalam
Dr Khan
January 25, 2013 2:14 pm
I have a dream...................... Martin Luther king.
Shafiq Khan
January 25, 2013 2:02 pm
Quite disappointed by such scholarly trickery. This chap seems to have not heard of a language used in Pakistan named "Urdu". The word "Insaaf" is very well understood and used in daily language. Why is he being so dim? Ask anybody in Pakistan and you will get a description of the concept of "Insaaf" without your so-called scholarship. People like him, so far have not been able to tell the meaning of,"Zowja" in Arabic to the Pakistanis., Or the meaning of the word "Umet" / "Umma" as it was in the days of the Prophet. I can give at least half a dozen more which have been the cause of fractures in the Muslim people. The Muslim Education for centuries has brought Muslims to the colonial period because the Education was left to half wit Mullahs and the sciences were ignored. The great education institutions in Egypt failed the famails of Islam The Education of girls was ignored based on so-called Islamic imagined principles.The Muslim world was subjected to colonial period because of Mullahs view of Education. Sort that out before you indulge in languages you do not understand.
abbastoronto
January 25, 2013 1:58 pm
Rafi Sahib: AOA The T of TUQ or TPI is not a controversial word as Insaf and Adl are. Rather than sarcastically and emotionally respond to my post (which I presume you have not pondered upon yet), I would suggest you take a deep breath and investigate how come "justice" has come to mean non-Quranic "Insaf" in Pakistan rather than the Quranic "Adl" as it is supposed to be. Therein lies the source of friction between the two main sects of Islam: Adl is a principal pillar of one of them but not of the other. I will let you find out which is which. As they say here in the West, the devil is in the detail. Wassalam
Karachi Wala
January 25, 2013 1:44 pm
Seems like Mr. Qadri got stumped on one. 99 short of a century!
Zinc
January 25, 2013 12:32 pm
Imran belongs to deobandi sect (Same as Taliban and other extremists) so there is nothing to worry for him until he give visit to any shrine, if only killing innocent people is the terrorist agenda behind suicide bombing, the biggest gathering is in Raiwand but terrorist wont blow themselves there because they have same ideology, for your kind info these are very well planned targets which you can only see on influential people who belong to minorities or Brelvi majority which are mostly now converted to wahabi or deobandi. you will only witness these terrorist blowing themselve on Ashura or Eid Milad un Nabi.
RX-1
January 25, 2013 12:29 pm
Ha, ha, Moderators own personal pet.
Reference
January 25, 2013 12:28 pm
Biggest quote book in the world but no understanding of any of it.
RSS
January 25, 2013 12:19 pm
Hindus actually.
FactCheck
January 25, 2013 12:17 pm
"prophet Jesus brought out a more humane sharia based on Love." . Not so. In the Bible Jesus clearly states that he had come to "Uphold the Law" of Moses, The Torah. To change the meaning and words of scripture is called blasphemy. You do that same with the Koran. You have a habit of coming here and ponificating at length without knowledge or undestanding of te subject.. You make up stuff and preach it as you go along and then you put your slant on it.
Mudassar
January 25, 2013 11:31 am
NFP lets start writing about MQM now please,because you love to bash others, WE love to read about beloved MQM......cheers.
Mudassar
January 25, 2013 11:17 am
Actually NFP didnt bother to mentioned MQM, I guess you remember that MQM enjoyed the participation in Musharaff's government, Imran Khan is very soft target for every one now days just to get bit of extra attention..........get a life man and please stop dragging Imran in every wrong doing.
Kashif
January 25, 2013 11:16 am
Lovely! But Turkey never had an Iqbal.
Nasir
January 25, 2013 11:14 am
Please improve your knowledge before you say something at any platform. You are talking about just a clip showing variation in blasphemy law by Dr. TUQ. If you can spare some time, see all those four different videos completely and then if you have some doubt, only speak then. Secondly, never thing what media is trying to make you think. Use your own brain. What were the motives of long march and what benefit that person is getting who clearly mentioned that he is not going to take part in elections. It was for us, for making us realize what our constitution says and how these corrupt politicians are looting us.
abbastoronto
January 25, 2013 10:59 am
LOL The Mullahs in Iran has been fighting the Monarchy for over centuries. It was the socialists who wanted to hijack the Revolution, but those with deeper involvement prevailed. Soon after the Revolution, the Soviet Union bit dust. Today, the godless system is discredited worldwide - East, West, North, South.
Rafi
January 25, 2013 9:05 am
Bro, Ever heard the Urdu phrase" Baal ki khaal utarna". Take a deep breath and analyse the word " Tehreek" in Allama TUQ's Pakistan Awami Tehreek.
Rafi
January 25, 2013 8:55 am
He also gets divine guidance in his dreams, talks to the dead,has sudden visions while walking and has failed in politics earlier. He drafted the blasphemy laws in Urdu and trashed the same laws in English. Very secular that. His religious discourses junk the politicians to hell while his political side hugs and praises the same politicians; all in the same container. I say mate Narinder Modi needs him more than we do; he might deliver him the Muslim vote he so desperately needs.
Khalid
January 25, 2013 8:50 am
It was like an action movie without any action, I am so disappointed .
Shan
January 25, 2013 8:11 am
Can pakistan be secular? Can it ensure equality to its Hindu citizens? Can Hindus practice and propogate? No. Pakistan is genetically brutal and retro.
Susan
January 25, 2013 7:55 am
Very useful article written with a lot of clarity especially for people trying to get some insights into the context - thank you Naddem very much
Observer
January 25, 2013 7:42 am
Can't agree more. Every word you have typed is precisely what I always say. Thank you. It seems there are two wise people left (Ganesh and observer). :-)