Judge Nizamul Huq presides over the International Crimes Tribunal (ICT), which was created in 2010 to try war crimes suspects. The tribunal has been widely criticised as being a political tool for the ruling Awami League government to target its opponents.—AP Photo/File

Judge Nizamul Huq presides over the International Crimes Tribunal (ICT), which was created in 2010 to try war crimes suspects. The tribunal has been widely criticised as being a political tool for the ruling Awami League government to target its opponents.—AP Photo/File

DHAKA: Bangladesh's controversial war crimes court Monday sentenced to death a top Islamic televangelist for genocide and other atrocities during the country's 1971 liberation struggle against Pakistan.

Maulana Abul Kalam Azad, who has been on the run for about a year, is the first person to be convicted by the International Crimes Tribunal created by the country's government to try suspected war criminals.

The International Crimes Tribunal, which was set up by Bangladesh's secular government in March, 2010, has come in for widespread criticism for targeting opposition leaders including the entire leadership of an Islamic party.

Prosecutors say that 63-year-old Azad, who also heads an Islamic charity, killed more than a dozen Hindus, raped Hindu women and abetted Pakistani forces in the genocide of Bangladeshis.

“He himself shot dead six Hindus and took part in a genocide,” prosecutor Shahidur Rahman told AFP.

Azad, who presented a widely watched show on Islam and Shariat for years on private and state-run television channels, is a former leading light of Bangladesh's largest Islamic party, Jamaat-e-Islami.

Eleven more opposition officials including Jamaat's leader and deputy leader as well two senior figures in the main opposition Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) are also being tried by the tribunal.

Both Jamaat and BNP have called the cases “politically motivated” while international rights groups have also questioned the proceedings and found loopholes in the war crime laws.

Abdus Shukur Khan, a tribunal-appointed lawyer for Azad, said the case was “false”.

“He was not involved in any of these crimes and was never named as a Pakistani collaborator in any of our war books,” he told AFP.

Muslim-majority Bangladesh, which was called East Pakistan until its independence in 1971, has struggled to come to terms with its violent birth.

The current government says up to three million people were killed in the war, many murdered by locals including allegedly by the members of Jamaat, collaborating with Pakistani forces.

The administration of Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, whose father led the country to independence, established the tribunal in March 2010. But the court has since been hit by a series of controversies and criticisms.

It has no United Nations oversight or involvement while the United States has said the laws under which the alleged war crime suspects are being tried fall short of international standards.


Comments are closed.

Comments (22)

Dev
January 22, 2013 8:01 pm
And before that the whole of India, Pakistan and large part of Afghanistan was ruled by Emperor Ashoka and the Mouryas. In short the greater India was ruled by indigenous people before the invaders usurped the land.
Ahmed Sultan (India)
January 22, 2013 12:04 pm
Not entire India but Delhi was ruled by muslims that too by Indian muslims
Virkaul
January 22, 2013 3:28 am
Better?
bibek
January 22, 2013 12:59 am
Funny!!!
HNY2013
January 22, 2013 12:50 am
and before that?
Cyrus Howell
January 21, 2013 8:52 pm
Not according to the Bangladeshis.
nafiz
January 21, 2013 2:30 pm
One can accuse all parties after independence for not iniatiating this trial but that can never be an excuse for not initiating at all. Better late than never.
Imran Siddiqui
January 21, 2013 1:23 pm
haha ... and entire India was ruled by Muslims for over athousand years so why cribbng against Pakistan?
hamid Shafiq
January 21, 2013 11:59 am
after 40 years and punish to his own citizen or opposition parties shows awami league justice if this is true so after bangladesh independnce why they are not made any tribunal for these things? why it after 40 years it means only awami league is loyal to bangldesh and rest parties is still propakistan? this type of controversial tribunal make more problem in bangladesh in the form of exterimism.
Parvez
January 21, 2013 10:47 am
Comments below claim he's in Pakistan...........not hard to believe.
raj
January 21, 2013 10:33 am
ya right Hasan.. and the whole of west pakistan is the former India... so why the cribbing each time against India
nafiz
January 21, 2013 10:16 am
Why do Bangladesh maintain diplomatic ties with pakistan when they give shelter to their partner in crime?
muzaffar
January 21, 2013 10:10 am
Dear....why just deport Mr Azad alone ....what about thousands of ill legal Bengali settlers living in Pakistan to earn a better livelihood....
justice
January 21, 2013 9:44 am
Shame on Bangali justice.
Hasan-SZ
January 21, 2013 9:37 am
As a Pakistani citizen every one has a right of abode in his country, East Pakistan is Pakistan so what else is there to crib about ?
Hasan-SZ
January 21, 2013 9:29 am
Good for him, atleast he got away from the kangroo court's dictated verdict.
Huma
January 21, 2013 8:55 am
As I dont know much about the situation, I cannot comment on the main report itself, but this line caught my eye and I had a good laugh... " while the United States has said the laws under which the alleged war crime suspects are being tried fall short of international standards". .... look whose talking!
Shyam
January 21, 2013 8:18 am
why did you miss out the portion. that Mr. Azad escaped to Pakistan a year ago and is currently residing in Pakistan?
Raj
January 21, 2013 8:09 am
A step in the right direction.
Rashid
January 21, 2013 8:04 am
Justice at last. Bangladesh Govt. should be commended for their courage and fortitude.
Anoop Hallimala
January 21, 2013 8:03 am
The report has not mentioned how he has run off to Pakistan fearing he will be sentenced. Why has Pakistan accepted him, as he is a Bangladeshi citizen? Shouldn't he be deported?
Ali
January 21, 2013 7:14 am
What does United States have to do with the laws of Bangladesh or for that matter any other country. How clean and just are their war crime laws? Bush , Chenny, Rumsfield and many others should have been hanged long time back if the true war crime laws are applied at home first.