poverty_urban_AP_670

A man, left, carries a bag past by Jamil Sirfiraz, 13, right, and Waqar Abdulghafar, 14, as they rest following their daily work at a puncture repair shop in Rawalpindi, Pakistan. – AP (File Photo)

KARACHI: Low economic growth,  relocating of industry, high food inflation and rising joblessness have together made the life of urban poor more painful and uglier, say economists, who are firm in the belief that the country is all set to miss the MDG targets.

The policy thrust of the government has been on stabilisation since 2008, having a direct bearing on overall economic activities. As a result, meagre GDP growth has pushed millions more below the poverty line.

Planning Commission Deputy Chairman Nadeemul Haq, when approached by Dawn, was reluctant and even got irritated by the query, saying he was in Dubai and receiving calls would cost him dearly.

Sartaj Aziz, a distinguished economist and former finance minister, said urban poverty was increasing mainly due to high food inflation, stagnant real incomes, rising unemployment and shrinkage of industrial base due to the rising cost of doing business and security issues triggering flight of capital and forcing many industrialists to relocate their businesses to other countries.

He said that in an environment of falling foreign and private investments, the incidence of poverty had not shown any signs of easing. In fact, the numbers have gone from bad to worse, he said, citing data from a recent report by the Social Policy and Development Centre.

The level of poverty had declined from 34.4 per cent of the population in 2001 to 28 per cent in 2005-06, but the high food inflation in the last three years has brought it back to 33 per cent, pushing at least 11 million people below the poverty line. When he was asked about the rising sale of mobile phones, refrigerators and other electronic goods, he said it was not an indicator of falling poverty, adding that many of these goods were import-intensive which put further pressure on the foreign exchange reserves.

He said an economic growth of six to seven per cent could reduce poverty as it generates employment opportunities and increase real incomes of the poor. “Only economic revival is the answer to poverty and other social problems,” he remarked, noting that the investment-to-GDP ratio had fallen to 13-15 per cent from 20 per cent in 1990s.

Arif Hassan, an expert on urban development and member of the UN committee that designed the goals for poverty reduction, said there was no reliable figures available depicting true picture of poverty ratio, but he was sure that during the last five years the urban-rural disparity had widened sharply.

He said poverty is not only about incomes, but also of access to quality health, education, justice, entertainment etc. He cited shrinking state sector, bad governance, corruption, low tax-base and anti-poor policies as the main culprits for the prevailing situation.

He said the per capita infrastructure investment in poor localities was not more than 10 per cent of what the settled localities received. He termed the foreign-funded initiatives cosmetic which were designed to misappropriate well-being funds of the poor. He said the cost of infrastructure projects was shown six to seven times of the actual to allow excessive profiteering by all concerned. “It is a system of loot and plunder,” he remarked.

For tackling poverty, he was of the view that the country didn’t need to look to the donors, but to capitalise on the national potential.

Dr Qaiser Bengali, former adviser to the Sindh Chief Minister on economic affairs, said macroeconomic indicators suggested urban poverty had risen because of stagnant industry and slowing services sector in the last four years. He, however, hastened to add that the agriculture sector was doing comparatively well, helping rural poor to fare better.

“Eliminating poverty has never been the strategic national economic policy of the state and there is no institutionalised framework available for performing this task,” he remarked. “Adopting a common agenda for eliminating poverty by developing a consensus of all players can only deliver the result,” he suggested.

Economist Syed Akbar Zaidi said poverty in urban areas was much lower than its rural component. “Poverty had fallen in the Musharraf period, but began to rise again in 2007 onwards till it went down in 2009 again. I agree with findings made by the World Bank and by PIDE that poverty has been falling over the last decade.”

According to poverty analysis done on the basis of data obtained through the Pakistan Social Living Standard Measurement (PSLM) survey in 2010-11, overall poverty had fallen to 12.4 per cent, with urban poverty at 7.1 per cent and rural poverty at 15.1 per cent. “These figures might not be accurate, but the important thing is the trend of decline. It would seem odd that even when the economy is performing poorly, poverty would decline, or at least, not rise. Probably the biggest poverty alleviation factor is the increase and distribution of remittances,” he said.


Comments are closed.

Comments (6)

Introspection
October 31, 2012 7:55 am
Yes poverty alleviation is possible in an Islamic society or Republic, like Pakistan…In the case of Islam as an ethical system, it is an accepted premise that policy decisions in an Islamic society must pass through an Islamic moral filter. The Islamic ethical system provides for more than a “Bill of Rights.” Its system defines a “Bill of Rights and Obligations” that guides the behavior of the government and the governed. For this to start taking effect in Pakistan, the center needs to be ‘surgically-overhauled’.
Sajjad
October 31, 2012 12:01 am
My dear silent majority is the problem.People dont speak for their rights and things get worst and worst.Take my words if one police man is beating a man in front of thousand of people on roads no body has courage to stop him .then what do you expect .
Saeed
October 30, 2012 11:48 pm
Rao, perfect solution , And all the Pakistani Goverments try to make some sense in Pakistani People , by introducing family planning commercial in Mainstream media for decades. But I think Pakistani people want this ugliness , so they can blames every Goverment .......there favorite hobby.
Seedoo
October 30, 2012 4:57 pm
When was the last time economy, education, law and order, and fighting poverty were the priorities of any government of Pakistan? For the past 40 years, religion has been our priority. The worse our economy gets, the more religious our society becomes. Is this not what the people of Pakistan wanted in the first place? So people now have what they have been craving all along. I have been living in the US for 28 years. The most backward states are the most religious and jingoistic. As Obama said: "they will always cling to guns and religion". Even though he was speaking of certain Americans, I think his quote is more applicable to Pakistanis and muslims in general.
Cyrus Howell
October 30, 2012 2:43 pm
"Low economic growth, relocating of industry, high food inflation and rising joblessness have together made the life of urban poor more painful and uglier..." . To the point! How much longer than this go on?
Rao
October 30, 2012 12:22 pm
Runaway population is the root cause of all these problems. Desperate struggle for survival and diminishing resources, corruption, pollution , breakdown in human communication and law and order. Etc.etc follow naturally from overpopulation. One child per couple is a good solution. Has anyboy thought about it? BTW overpopulation is the curse everywhere mostly in South Asia.