Aseem-Trivedi-AFP-670

Aseem-Trivedi-AFP-670

Cartoonist Aseem Trivedi, (C), who was arrested on sedition charges, is produced at a court in Mumbai on Sept 10, 2012. — Photo by AFP

MUMBAI: A court in Mumbai ruled Tuesday that an Indian political cartoonist jailed on a sedition charge over his sketches could be bailed after outrage mounted over his detention.

The Bombay High Court bench said Aseem Trivedi, a freelance cartoonist and anti-corruption campaigner, “can be released on a personal bond” of 5,000 rupees ($90), the Press Trust of India news agency reported.

“If drawing those cartoons is the only charge, then his custody is not required,” a two-judge bench at the court was quoted as saying.

Trivedi's lawyer, Vijay Hiremath, said it was not clear what position the cartoonist would now take, having earlier said he would refuse bail and wanted the charges against him thrown out.

“Only once the order is communicated by his friends to him will we know what his stance will be,” Hiremath told AFP, adding that sedition was usually a non-bailable offence.

His father Ashok Trivedi told local television reporters that “we do not accept bail because he has not committed any crime”.

His arrest at the weekend has sparked a domestic and international backlash against the government, accused by critics of using the colonial-era sedition law to crush dissent.

Media rights group Reporters Without Borders was among those calling for the immediate and unconditional release of Trivedi, one of whose sketches depicted the national parliament as a huge toilet bowl.

“The prosecution and detention of the cartoonist are a gross violation of freedom of expression and information,” the Paris-based organisation said.

Trivedi's arrest came after India ordered more than 300 websites, social networking pages, Twitter accounts and other online content to be blocked last month in an attempt to halt the spread of rumours about ethnic violence.

The New York-based Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) echoed calls for Trivedi to be freed in a case that has sparked widespread debate about freedom of expression in India.

“Criminalising Aseem Trivedi's efforts to highlight the serious problem of corruption is a perverse exercise of power and runs completely counter to India's democratic principles,” said Bob Dietz, CPJ's Asia program coordinator.

Cartoons on Trivedi's website also show the sole surviving gunman from the 2008 Mumbai attacks urinating on the Indian constitution.

Another one titled “Gang Rape of Mother India” shows a woman draped in the Indian flag being held down by a politician and a bureaucrat as a horned animal depicting corruption appears ready to attack her.

Trivedi was arrested in Mumbai on Saturday under laws governing sedition, information technology and protecting India's national flag and constitution, after a private complaint from a young lawyer based in the city.

A court on Monday ordered the cartoonist to be held in custody until Sept 24.

The Times of India in its lead editorial on Tuesday called for the British colonial-era sedition law to be scrapped.

“In independent India, instead of being revoked, the sedition law has been used against a variety of dissent,” it said.

“Independent India's politicians are clearly using the archaic colonial law as a tool of contemporary intimidation.”

The Indian Express said that moves against Trivedi were like using “an H-bomb to slay a rabbit”.

Law Minister Salman Khurshid has insisted that the Indian court system is independent of the government, adding that “there is rule of law and an appropriate procedure...I am sure that the law will take its own course”.

In the most famous recent sedition case, Indian doctor and human rights activist Binayak Sen was jailed for life in 2010 for allegedly helping Maoist rebels.

He was freed on bail last year on the instructions of the Supreme Court which ruled that the sentence should be suspended.

India has recently shown sensitivity to criticism of its leaders, with the government responding angrily to a Washington Post article on the struggling Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, who has been hit by a string of graft scandals.

Accusations of intolerance over satirical cartoons surfaced in May when lawmakers reacted in fury over an old cartoon being used in school textbooks lampooning B.R. Ambedkar, author of India's constitution.


Comments are closed.

Comments (9)

z2cents
September 12, 2012 4:25 pm
Nice to see the country comming together to support the dude
Arson
September 12, 2012 12:11 pm
Surpirsingly This is the same country that conferred many awards on Salman Rushdie in the name of freedom of expression. Shame on so called Decular Indian image
Siddhu
September 12, 2012 12:11 pm
We love Salman Rushdie,he is a brilliant man.He can speak his mind in india and so can his opponents.
jo
September 12, 2012 10:54 am
What does secularism have to do with this case? Secularism is about religion, or treating all religions equally. This case is about freedom of expression, a right granted by the Indian Constitution. The debate here is about whether freedom of expression too has its boundaries, or is it a case of anything goes?
Amit
September 12, 2012 10:50 am
How, in any way and direction, this has to do anything with 'Secular' India? Please don't make fool of yourself by such comments
shamma parveen
September 12, 2012 9:06 am
at least in our country justice prevails
Ranjith
September 12, 2012 7:51 am
Which award has he received from India. Certainly not from the Indian govt. Dont know if any private organisation has given him any awards. His book is banned in India. Probably the first country in the world to ban it.
Mustafa Razavi
September 12, 2012 6:58 am
This is the same country that conferred many awards on Salman Rushdie in the name of freedom of expression. There were lovers of freedom of expression on this very forum criticizing Imran Khan for refusing a "literary" conference in India where Rushdie was also invited.
NKhan
September 12, 2012 5:30 am
Secular India:)