EXPECTATIONS were low ahead of Indian Foreign Minister S.M. Krishna’s visit to Islamabad this week and, after two days of meetings culminating in a joint press conference yesterday, the predictions appear to have been largely correct. The big news is the inking of a liberalised visa regime between the two countries, a deal that was ready to be signed several months ago when the Indian commerce secretary visited but was delayed on the Pakistani side for as yet unspecified reasons. While welcome news, much will depend on the vigour and sincerity with which the new visa arrangements are implemented: even the most high-minded of ideas have often failed the implementation test when it comes to these two countries. Beyond that, however, there is not much good news to report from the meetings that capped off a year of dialogue between Pakistan and India.

What seems to be clear is that the two countries have yet to recover the ground lost to the Mumbai attacks of November 2008. A little nudge here, a little push forward there, the dramatic steps have been eschewed in favour of small, uncontroversial measures. Leave aside Siachen or Sir Creek, even on the necessary move to allow Pakistani television channels access to the Indian market, there has been no movement. In the Pakistani and Indian context, the core issues and other problems are so well known and defined that if allowed to, diplomats, politicians and security establishments can dance around them forever unless someone grabs the issues by the scruff of the neck and forces some forward movement. Thus far, there is no one on either side who has been able to do that, even as many suspect that at least at the very top of the political leadership in both countries, the desire for normalising ties is deep and potentially meaningful.

Perhaps the big gesture that could force a more rapid pace of normalisation is the much promised but long-awaited trip of Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh to Pakistan. Mr Krishna once again baulked at giving a positive answer to Pakistan’s invitation to Mr Singh to visit in November around the time of an important date in the calendar of the Sikh religion. All that Mr Krishna would say is that he would go back to India and brief his prime minister on the weekend talks and apprise him whether the situation was conducive to a visit by the Indian prime minister. The caution on the Indian side is standard play but neither will it help achieve what Prime Minister Singh and the Pakistani political leadership desire: movement towards a durable peace.


Comments are closed.

Comments (9)

NASAH (USA)
September 10, 2012 3:50 am
With some exceptions Hindus In general are tolerant people -- it is we Muslim who have to decide if we want to stop hating Hindus.
BRR
September 10, 2012 3:32 am
There is no hurry. Things will take some time. These two nations are cursed to live next to each other. There is no magic that can take away the damage done from 60 years of warlike atmosphere.
Zahid Iqbal
September 10, 2012 3:15 am
Pakistan and India can solve their problems if both sides are sincere to take any step forward.India has been reluctant to the solution of these problems from the very beginning .Pakistan takes one step forward while India takes back. The world is fully aware of Indian insincerity to the solution of the problems.
p m rao
September 10, 2012 2:26 am
punish 26/11 criminals and handover dawood,then i am sure the relations will leapfrog including kashmir.until then the charade will continue.
(Dr.) B.N. Anand
September 9, 2012 6:38 pm
Sir, regaining the trust between the two countries is the key to any further movement in relationship. You rightly said the implementation of liberal visa regime in an honest way would indeed be a sort of acid test. In my opinion, if there is perceptible movement in the conviction of Mumbai carnage case in Pakistan courts, it would work wonder in building trust. At least, even this visit has been of a cosmetic exercise, yet it keeps the negotiations going and that is what should be a satisfying factor. It is better to keep the line of communication open and move with patience. Thanks BNA
Iftikhar Husain
September 9, 2012 11:10 am
We have to wait and see what comes out of this visit. We have to wish them good luck.
Qudrat Ali
September 9, 2012 10:55 am
Rightly analyzed the trip and on going formalities on both sides.
Taaruf
September 9, 2012 7:47 am
It is positive and optimistic sign that both governments are ambitious to maintain and sustain peace in the region. They, therefore, have been struggling to normalising healthy relations. Yet there is no any proactive implementation on either side. Rather having futile tete-e-tete, Pakistan and Indian politicians should come forward to resolve gunuine prolong issue of Kashmir, Siachen glacier, Sir Creek issue and the most importantly remove trust deficit between eachother. This can produce dividends to both. The new visa reform is a welcome move but it again need a practical approach to achieve its end results, that is peace and healthy relations between them. Harping on the same string from either side could only add misunderstangs and apprehensions which would certainly widen the unbridgeable gap.
M. Asghar
September 9, 2012 6:52 am
Yes, there is la ot of "dead weight of lack of trust" between the two sides that is blocking the movement forwards. Here, the pressure andd push of the civil society on both sides should be encouraged to unbrake the train.