Iftikhar Chaudhry

iftikharchaudhryOnline670

Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry. — File photo/Online

RAWALPINDI: Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry has said the courts could give guidelines to legislatures to amend laws, rules and regulations.

Addressing the lawyers’ community at the inauguration ceremony of the Judicial Complex here on Monday, the chief justice said there was no doubt that judges could not legislate but they could at least set such standards through their rational and research-based judgments to serve as guidelines for legislators for making necessary changes in outdated laws and regulations.

Justice Iftikhar said the judiciary was the ultimate protector of citizens’ rights and liberties. The judiciary was fully alert and responsive to people’s grievances and sufferings, he said, adding that the nation reposed confidence in the judiciary and it was the duty of judges and lawyers to act as a bulwark against constitutional excesses and arbitrariness in order to make Pakistan a welfare state.

He expressed the hope that the new judicial complex building would have far-reaching effects on the administration of justice by bringing all subordinate courts under one roof. Bar associations played a vital role in promoting and defending the rule of law, he added.

The chief justice said the Rawalpindi bar association was a flag-bearer in the historic movement launched by lawyers for the independence of judiciary and cause of justice in the country.

Speaking at the occasion, Justice Shakirullah Jan said the movement for the restoration of judiciary encouraged the judges of superior and subordinate judiciary and they started deciding cases in accordance with the law, and not according to the wishes of the rulers.

He said that as acting chief election commissioner he had strived to remove flaws from the electoral rolls and the new computerised rolls would be printed by July 25.

Justice Umer Ata Bandial pointed out that about 300 fake lawyers were listed on the LHC bar.

He said the lawyers’ associations should reconsider their policy about going on strikes which disrupted the court proceedings for an entire day and added to the misery of the litigants.


Comments are closed.

Comments (15)

Owais Siddiqui
July 24, 2012 6:28 pm
Kakar sahab probabily you are trying to say "since you didn't see any action from the judiciary on May 12 incident you conclude that judiciary is not independent". I feel sorry for our short sightedness.
Mustafa
July 20, 2012 3:17 am
I thought judges only express legal opinion when they are sitting on bench judicating a matter before court. I have no problem when judges retire and become politicians. Please correct me if I am wrong.
HASHIM KARIMH
July 18, 2012 3:23 pm
CJ statement with use of words MAY GIVE GUIDENCE iS DISCOURAGING? It is hoped ammended lawby parluament in 60 minutes for benefit of rullers only and not the remaining 180 millions be rejected and declared null and void.
Fida Ahmed Advocate
July 18, 2012 10:45 am
The whole issue is about peoples' rights. If they get their rights, then ok, otherwise they will be left with the only choice of snatching them.
M. Asghar
July 18, 2012 9:57 am
What would you, if the small brothers have lost all sense of direction and responsability?
sanaullah khan kakar
July 18, 2012 9:54 am
i have only one question from chief justice and all pakistani's,if their answer satisfied me, i will accepted that judiciary is independent, question is that, if judiciary is independent then why chief justice is silent about the incident of twelve may.
logic Europe
July 18, 2012 6:47 am
Mr jan says previously decisions were made according to the wishes of the rulers but not now so shouldn't all those judges beunished ?? or is there an NRO for them judges slowly seem to be taking over the real authority of the state Wht the judges are saying now is what the dictators have said all,along
Fida Ahmed Advocate
July 18, 2012 5:57 am
(favourable) decision on merit?
Normanj
July 18, 2012 3:59 am
Do we need a big brother to guide and tell us?
NASAH (USA)
July 17, 2012 10:19 pm
CJ says -- "it was the duty of judges and lawyers to act as a bulwark against constitutional excesses and arbitrariness in order to make Pakistan a welfare state." May we ask -- whose duty it will be "to act as a bulwark against constitutional excesses and arbitrariness" -- by the judges themselves? Like usurping the job of the parliament to fire the prime minister?
BA Khan
July 17, 2012 8:15 pm
Judges shouldn't be speaking on social interactions/occasions. I am always surprised when I see CJ giving statements or when his remarks during a proceeding makes headlines in the newspapers. Judges are there to dispense justice over the legal turf provided to them by the parliamentarians. They are neither guardians of law nor there is any need of public support for them. The lawyer movement euphoria should subside by now. Judges are very honourable but at the end, they are judicial bureaucrats just like other civil or military bureaucrats. It would be futile to say that some deputy commissioner or home secretary is very popular and has public support. The publicity, public support, charisma, demagogue-ism for good or bad is meant for politicians and political parties.
pleasant
July 17, 2012 2:57 pm
Don't know if it is judiciary or media that is issuing these comments. Comments from judges are harmful. Judges' only job is to give judgment not issue statements like politicians..
Agha Ata
July 17, 2012 1:45 pm
I didn’t know a post existed in the constitution that could guide the Chief Justice on legal matters.
ghulam shabbir
July 17, 2012 10:11 am
Judiciary must not decide arbitrarily .decision on merit is always appreciated by every one & every where ,all the times.
Ram Parkash
July 17, 2012 4:57 am
I support the assertion fully.