Pakistani-youth_290

Islamic fundamentalism in the modern political context can be described as an attempt to attain an ‘Islamic State’ through political mobilisation, revolutionary action or government legislation.

Even though, ever since the 1980s, Islamic fundamentalism in this context has rapidly evolved into meaning and incorporating a number of varied interpretations of political Islam, the basic concept has remained the same: To ‘Islamise’ the society from below so an Islamic State can effectively be constructed from above.

Islamic fundamentalism has had an active presence in the milieu of youth and student movements and politics in Pakistan. One of its leading components in this respect has been the student-wing of the Jamaat-i-Islami (JI), the Islami Jamiat-i-Tuleba (IJT).

Others, like the Anjuman-i-Tuleba Islam (ATI), Jamiat-i-i Tuleba Islam (JTI) - the student wing of Jamiat Ulema Islam (JUI) - and the Imamia Students Organization (ISO) have also been driven by the political ideals of Islamic fundamentalism.

Soon after the creation of a separate Muslim country in the shape of Pakistan (in 1947), colleges and universities in most Muslim-majority regions of India were dominated by the student wing of the Muslim League (ML) - the Muslim Students Federation (MSF).

MSF, like its mother party, was largely anti-fundamentalist in orientation (if not secular) and its ideology was heavily rooted in the modernist Muslim political philosophies championed by Indian Muslim thinkers like Sir Syed Ahmed Khan, Muhammad Iqbal and Pakistan’s founding father, Muhammad Ali Jinnah.

Even when, after 1950, the Muslim League and (consequently) MSF began to disintegrate into various opposing factions, politics in Pakistani campuses did not fall in the hands of the more right-wing forces. Instead, the vacuum was at once filled by left-wing and progressive student outfits.

The Democratic Students Federation (DSF), which was close to the Communist Party of Pakistan (CPP) and the National Students Federation (NSF), which was ideologically linked to the left-wing National Awami Party (NAP)-dominated student and youth politics in the 1950s and 1960s respectively.

A 1966 poster of the left-wing National Students Federation (NSF). – Photo courtesy Apna Kal Blog

nsf-banner-ed

A 1966 poster of the left-wing National Students Federation (NSF). – Photo courtesy Apna Kal Blog

However, the IJT began taking a more direct part in campus politics after the emergence of Field Marshal Ayub Khan’s military coup in 1958.

In what was then a predominantly secular and pro-West social and political setting, IJT initiated a two-pronged mission on campuses, in which it not only opposed the Ayub dictatorship’s secularising policies and legislation, but also looked to check the continuing growth of leftist and progressive political groups in colleges and universities.

Basing its ideology on the political writings of the highly influential Islamic scholar, political Islamist and the chief of the Jamaat-i-Islami, Abul Ala Maududi, the IJT did manage to carve out important areas of ideological influence and electoral strength in various universities and colleges of Karachi and Lahore.

But across the 1960s, bulk of the students’ electoral and ideological support remained largely with the progressive student groups, especially the NSF.

NSF ideologue Rasheed Hassan surrounded by NSF workers and supporters at Dow Medical College, Karachi (1969). – Photo courtesy Apna Kal Blog

nsf-group-ed

NSF ideologue Rasheed Hassan surrounded by NSF workers and supporters at Dow Medical College, Karachi (1969). – Photo courtesy Apna Kal Blog

One of the first prominent exhibitions of Islamic fundamentalism articulated as a political expression in student politics of Pakistan emerged when (between 1968 and 1970) IJT and its mother party began a concentrated movement against the Pakistan Peoples Party (formed in 1967) in former West Pakistan and the Bengali nationalist party, the Awami League (AL), in former East Pakistan.

IJT distributed a number of anti-socialist (and ‘pro-Islam’) pamphlets and got embroiled in clashes with activists of the PPP, AL and NSF.

Its opponents accused IJT of being ‘funded by the military regime of General Yahya Khan’ and by the American CIA, whom the leftists accused of using JI and IJT in its Cold War against the political influence of the Soviet Union.


Comments are closed.

Comments (185)

gary
July 26, 2012 8:03 pm
Gandhi's name itself evokes a common response the world over. He is respected in every country of the world with the exception of Pakistan. For the Pakistani's it's almost as if he didn't exist! ...... Manjoor Elahi, this tells us all about the Pakistani mindset.
gary
July 26, 2012 8:02 pm
This is all kaffir talk, inspired by foreign agencies
gary
July 26, 2012 7:54 pm
Muslims are more worried about their after life than their present lives. Muslims have herd mentality. they donot question whether there is a heaven or hell or it is just a fiction.
gary
July 26, 2012 7:37 pm
Right you are.
Neerj
July 21, 2012 4:15 pm
So rightly said bro
anonymous
July 18, 2012 12:15 am
a good assessment by you....
MHK
July 2, 2012 10:11 am
Good work. It would have been better to talk about youth other than universities and colleges, the Public.
ahsan
June 28, 2012 3:27 pm
Khan, This is the mind set of typical uneducated Pakistani. We are the best all others are not and it is our islamic duty to kiil ppl who are not like us. first time you heard of " well known fact of millions of Muslims leaving Islam" because u live in a cave. Any you read only one book that was given to you by your boyfriend mullah, 15 years ago. Remember you are not allowed to read anything else, or u will go to hell. I agree with you. I just don't trust anyone any more in Pakistan politics. Also I have lost my hope for this nice country. It been hijacked by mullahs by the help of SA and West.
Nasir
June 22, 2012 6:34 pm
I completely agree with you, perhaps we need to change it back to its original name Peoples Republic of Pakistan.
El Cid
June 18, 2012 6:34 am
Sir, your statement is an abomination...a lie about two great personalities of the Sub-Continent and much respected and loved by its inhabitants and admired by scholars of history and politics. It describes your propensities rather than theirs.
El Cid
June 18, 2012 6:28 am
Bani Quriaza's facts and fallacies are well documented as you state. The Mahatma was indeed aware of this significant episode of Jurisprudence in nascent Islam: Judge, jury, Justice. Gandhi had studied the Hadiths & Sira. Indeed he knew significant passages of the Noble Qur’an from memory. These facts and his assessment of The Prophet's life and fairness in justice and his decision making ability are categorically recognized, implied, and reflected in Mr. Gandhi’s statement quoted above. A neutral mind is an absolute if one intends to study and learn from what one reads. Please shift to neutral and re-read the Mahatma's statement and verify before denying it.
Khair-Khwah
June 16, 2012 3:52 am
Fundamentalism and extremism in any shape, way or form is harmful and obstructive for an individual or a society. It is definitely obstructing us as a nation to progress. When our whole country is plagued with corruption, crime, disorganization and chaos, we have to turn to the true teachings of Islam to gain a sense of direction and motivation. Today the question we should be asking ourselves is that do we like to continue on the same destructive path we have been walking for the last 64 years or do we as a nation stop for a moment and re-evaluate our actions so we can once more get back onto the Sirat-e-Mustaqeem, a path which leads us to success in this World and the Life Hereafter. Instead of creating chaos, as a nation we should be reformualting our course of actions to better our education system, economy, health system and to emerge as an economic and moral power house on the World Stage. The answer to our problems is moderation, innovation, vision and planning. Rest assured these objectives are achievable, all that is needed is courage to make a change for betterment. A little mix of UNITY, FAITH & DISCIPLINE is a sure recipie for success!! Be the CHANGE you want to see in the World!! Let us make it happen together!!
El Cid
June 14, 2012 8:53 pm
Personally am not in favor of restrictive laws...this one is an anathema to the very spirit of Islam. However it was constructed as a defensive "fence" againsts foreign elements that were exploiting poor un-informed local Christians as foil against Islam nd Muslims...a ploy that has been exploited rather successfully in many other Muslim countries. Countries such as Indonesia, Sudan, Phillipines immediately come to mind, others...
ganz
June 10, 2012 12:09 am
As an outsider, I see the blasphemy law as the greatest hurdle to achieve any meaningful reforms . It is foolish to expect a change to come over without free will and freedom of speech. whatever change that happens only happens within the fence created by mullahs and that is not a true change.
saleem
June 9, 2012 11:12 am
that is condembale and i am sure you will also condemn (still on-going) killing of muslims in pak by other muslims (for facts see bangladesh, bauchistan and other parts of pakistan etc.)
Muhammad
June 8, 2012 11:21 am
we cannot do this because he was incinerated in the plane crash
El Cid
June 8, 2012 9:24 am
Wrong! Only one verse, perhaps two. The Noble clearly states that it is addressing all of humanity. No one is chosen...what have you been reading?
El Cid
June 8, 2012 9:11 am
You comment speaks for mine. Thank you.
the Pond
June 8, 2012 4:32 am
Well conservative figures from the red cross indicate that over a million muslims have been killed by non muslims in Iraq in the past twenty two years. Your facts are not facts.
Srini
June 7, 2012 6:26 pm
NFP, I am waitinf for you to write about the corruption of minds by misusing the education system in Pakistan. Unless the education system changes and Madarasas are eliminated, there is no hope for Pakistan in my opinion.
Idrees
June 7, 2012 5:27 pm
i like ur comment
Idrees
June 7, 2012 5:25 pm
very good
Shekhar
June 7, 2012 8:32 am
It is a fact Muslims killed by muslims (is much greater than) non-muslims killed by muslims (is much greater than) muslims killed by non-muslims.
Pramod
June 7, 2012 6:45 am
You are wrong. Most of the comments written for other religion and countries stays. but any thing related Islam or Pakistan is mostly deleted or modified.
Abdul
June 6, 2012 8:43 am
I agree
Shekhar
June 6, 2012 7:46 am
That was just the advertisement to get more adherents - This is the REAL Islam - Violence and non-tolerance - not just for non-muslims but for even other muslims and those who are not muslims enough - from Aurangzeb to Jinnah to Zakir Naik !
Manish
June 6, 2012 7:38 am
That is because Gandhi too felt the need to be politically correct since he was the leader of both Hindus and Muslims. On the other hand muslim leaders like Jinnah would make no favourable statement on other religions because they engaged in politics of Hate.
Shekhar
June 6, 2012 7:28 am
They are - 1/3rd of Quran is addressed to Arabs alone - they are the chosen ones according to Islam - whether you like it or not !
Shekhar
June 6, 2012 7:27 am
How could Jinnah and his Muslim League be called "Secular"? They openly preached violence which was aptly demonstrated on "Direct Action Day". Even after partition - Hindus and Sikhs were persecuted and hounded out resulting in their population decimating from 27% to 1%. Even the fist Law minister of Pakistan J.N.Mandal had to flee to India.
Mohammad Ali Khan
June 4, 2012 2:25 am
El Cid, Good quotation. This is a window in history,doesn't necessarily needs judgment.
Peace Maker
June 3, 2012 3:45 pm
Well Said!!
Aks
June 3, 2012 1:53 pm
Well said, Karachiwala!
TXDTTT
June 3, 2012 11:57 am
Hahah no, I just chose random alphabets when I started out and just kept my name the way it is.
Mujeeb Nizamani
June 3, 2012 11:15 am
Nice piece of work NFP. I wonder why nobody touches the core issue (to me) of Islamic Republic of Pakistan i.e. Identity Crisis. Thats why we have a society full of paradoxes. For instance, the rural section of society in Pakistan, esp from minority provinces is less radicalized then urban section unlike the general case. And thats only one of the many paradoxes emanating from the crisis of Identity Framework.
Virendra Kaul
June 3, 2012 5:22 am
Malik Saheb: you are on the dot. This should eliminate 90% problems.
Rahul
June 2, 2012 10:59 pm
I have been browsing through many Pakistani news sites and what is palpable is the deep sense of despair and disappointment at the current state of affairs. It is really disheartening to see you guys give up so easily. Or maybe that's what is apparent.
Abid Rahman
June 2, 2012 3:23 pm
Totally disagree with Mr. Paracha on Tableeghi Jamaat stance. Tableeghi Jamat is the only non-political organization which never supports hatred or any other stance supported by Tahreek-e-Khabessan Pakistan (also called Taliban).
Asim
June 2, 2012 2:09 pm
Sticking the word religious to the activities of these political factions would be massive blunder these groups were supporting there hidden causes and agendas. have anybody ever seen any action taking place once the demands of these groups are met? the movement arising out were just to extenuate the the wrong steps taken by the groups themselves. can anybody point out any action or development that has taken place in response to the movements of these groups in terms of attaining an Islamic state. Islam don't give lesson of scuffle and bloodshed but it conveys a message of peace. first step in bringing an Islamic state would be to order the lives as per teachings of Quran and Sunnah.
AHA
June 2, 2012 1:42 pm
Khan – So is this the peace and tolerance that your ‘complete way of life’ preaches you.
El Cid
June 2, 2012 1:34 pm
Gulf-Arabs are NOT the arbiters of Islam or Muslims...their behaviour certainly fails to meet Islamic criteria as given in the Noble Koran. What is your point?
Anant Jain
June 2, 2012 1:29 pm
I do not know if you really cared to not just do a text book study of history. Regarding caste system, the only reasons Muslims could rule India for so long was because they did not touch the caste system on the other hand they patronized it. The Mughal rulers always had Rajput Sardars as ministers and inter marriage between the Rajputs and Mughals were common affair. The only reason Mughal rule was relatively peaceful was because they allowed the continuation of exploitation of dalits. Frankly there have always been two classes the rulers and the ruled, and the rulers do not mind sharing the exploits within themselves. Coming to those who got ruled there was always a set of people who thought that the rulers belonged to them. And, if you still don't get point look around you in Pakistan, I have had a look around me in India and it is still the same.
AHA
June 2, 2012 1:15 pm
Babu - I actually read your comment before it was taken off. I think we are not ready for that kind of debate yet. We all need our baby steps first.
AHA
June 2, 2012 12:57 pm
Wow! So many thumbs down to my post. I attribute this reaction to the short-sightedness of the human mind. You look at all that is wrong with Pakistan today, and you conclude that we were always a bunch of throat slashing fundamentalists. You (again) need to look at some previous blogs from Nadeem Paracha to recognize that Pakistan was a pretty normal country till mid-70s in terms of the influence of Islam in our day to day issues. While life was pretty normal in that sense, a deep routed frustration was growing because of social and economic injustices. The Islamists got their day under Zia, and destroyed all the good that existed in Pakistan. My take will always be that Islamic fundamentalism in Pakistan has nothing to do with the creation of Pakistan. It came only after Zia.
punjabi jatt
June 2, 2012 11:21 am
Faizullah Khalil, interesting observation.
Abdur Razzaque
June 2, 2012 10:00 am
It is the love,respect and dignity for each others made it possible to spread Islam in the world. It is again Islam got a strong foothold in Indonesia and other south Asian countries over the false pride of the Brahmins superiority complex and that vague ideas forced the lower castes to cross the Bay of Bengal and started a new civilization with Islam!
Abdur Razzaque
June 2, 2012 9:43 am
Mr. Shri, Please read the Hindu dynastic rules in the then India carefully, you will find hundreds of the despotic and debauch rulers names in the history. They on one hand killed their own families and even on the other hand killed the innocent civilians and massacred the locality after localities. History is a mirror of the past and even look at one of your neighour country where greediness compelled a prince to kill everybody in his family. Islam is the only religion that does not believe in any kinds of caste or creed. Everybody is equal before Allah and His Book strongly condemns all these vices in our society!
Kafir
June 2, 2012 9:32 am
Opportunity, Responsibility and Reward are unique social items that always existed but their importance and relationship has been growing for the last few centuries. As world has become relatively freer (in terms of opportunity since 18th/19th century) in the fields of politics and economy, a person or entity can claim systematic discrimination when opportunity is denied on an equal basis in a systematic way. Examples of such systematic discrimination are Caste system in pre-independent India, Aparthied in South Africa and Discrimination of Blacks in USA prior to Civil Rights Act of 1964. In the case of pre-independent Indian sub-continent, there was no systematic discrimination agaist muslims. There were elements of inter-religious suspicion, inter-religious jealousy but no systematic discrimination against muslims. In a free state politics and economy, Reward is a direct and proportional outcome of using opportunity and displaying responsibility. In the pre-independent Indian sub-continent, muslims and hindus might have had different rewards but as long as the opportunities were same, then in my opinion there was no systematic discrimination. Indian sub-continent partition was the result of an extremely wrong combination: Using maximum opportunity and taking least responsibility. Muslims as a group used the opportunity to request for a separate nation. Like i said in my previous comment, they were not ready to live as minority (a very large minority) in the un-partiotioned country but they were expecting other minorities to be ready to live in their new country. That was NOT a display of taking up responsibility. Pakistan history books in schools and under-grad colleges (I'm guessing) might teach that Mr. Jinnah was ready for a compromise confederation formula. If it was really true (not just in someone's lip movement), why should the Hindu centre right wing kill Mr. Gandhi ? Irony, isn't it ? Using an opportunity is not a wrong idea as long as responsibility could be displayed over and above the level of opportunity used. Pakistani people and leadership have used a lot of opportunities since partition. If someone were to test them for responsibility (intra and inter national), will the results be sweet ?
Abdur Razzaque
June 2, 2012 9:22 am
like others I am curious to know why you do not allow all the comments or delete the comment once we send to you. I think you do not believe in truth. Sorry, to tell you that the truth is always bitter in test.
Abdur Razzaque
June 2, 2012 9:04 am
Dear Faizullah Khalil: Thank you for your opinion. In order to live in a greater society or to form a nation, we must give up our regional sentiment. Nation and nationality is the final and finest work for a country. Look at all the countries in the world, even look at the USA you will see all the states and even with different cultures tied up them together for a broader mentality. That mentality inspires them to form a federal govt. and a glorious country. In order to make Pakistan a strong and stronger country, let us give up and change our narrow mentality. Unity is strength. Remember this proverb and a good instruction also from Allah (SWT). Narrowness and jealousy will ultimately lead you to the destruction and Allah forbid, if anything happens with your greater unity (PAKISTAN) the next generation will blame and curse you for your big mistakes. Tolerance,love and respects and trust each others will enable you to make a strong nation in the world.
Harsh Sharma
June 2, 2012 8:36 am
The writer has not traced the history from the strating point.Muslim league leaders had a very short vision and were fundamentalists and caused division of India which would have been a great superpower today.Muslims are the greatest sufferers.Now if they give up fundamentalism the logical question that arises is why Pakistan was created,what will then differentiate it from India.Jinnah realised his folly when in the constituent assembly he declared that it would be a secular country.This declaration was against the very idea of Pakistan.Now it is too late and more and more divisions are appearing in Pakistan on sectarian basis.Alas!they had realised the value of secularism in 1940-1947 and not dismembered the great motherland whose equal children they would have always been. Dr.Harsh Sharma